Looney Tunes Wiki:Here to build an encyclopedia

This is an official project page of Looney Tunes Wiki. This means that these are guidelines of our wiki rules and policies, which must be followed. Failure to follow these rules can result in blocks from editing this wiki and its affiliates.

Shortcut:
LTW:HERE

The Looney Tunes Wiki is a wiki database. As such, content is far more important than any individual user. All users who edit here should be here to build an encyclopedia. We will get very annoyed if users merely come on this site to edit their user pages. To a lesser extent, we will also express frustration if users don't actually contribute constructively, but merely talk about unrelated subjects on the Discussions board.

Those who are not here to build an encyclopedia are generally unwelcome here, and sanctions will be applied to those users who join and are not here to build an encyclopedia.

Being here to build an encyclopedia

Shortcut:
LTW:HERE

Signs that a user might be here to build the Looney Tunes Wiki encyclopedia include:

• Authentic interest and improvement: A certified interest in working on the broad substance (articles and media). This frequently includes many interests, and meaningful alters/article composing or other huge exercises (e.g., coding or watching). It might likewise incorporate huge helpful upgrades to the cycles that are engaged with working on happy, or relieving and decreasing issues that make a negative commitment to the Looney Tunes Wiki.
• Regard for center altering norms: Acting as per center concurred arrangements when altering, remembering strategies for content and conduct.
• An emphasis on encyclopedia building: Non-encyclopedia building related commitments are kept to a restricted level in examination with positive and straightforwardly useful commitments to the encyclopedia as well as its publication processes.
• Self-amendment and regarding illustrations: At the point when missteps are made, there is noticeable work to gain from them. The user seems to treat altering in a serious way and works on their publication capacity and nature of info.

Clearly not being here to build an encyclopedia

Shortcut:
LTW:NOTHERE

The following may show that the user is not here to build an encyclopedia:

• Zeroing in on the Looney Tunes Wiki as a person-to-person communication site: An essential spotlight on the wiki as an interpersonal interaction space (resumes, virtual entertainment type pages, and so forth.) The user is likewise just keen on taking part in the conversations sheets. The user additionally has no aims to contribute to the wiki mainspace pages, or has more user page and discussion boards edits than mainspace edits.
• Altering just in the user space: The user is just keen on editing their user page, and is additionally just keen on partaking in the Discussions Boards. The user additionally has no aims to contribute to the wiki mainspace pages, or has more user page and discussion boards edits than mainspace edits.
• General example of problematic way of behaving: A drawn out history of problematic way of behaving, like vandalism with almost no indication of positive expectations.
• Regarding altering as a landmark: Unreasonable soapboxing, heightening of questions, rehashed unfriendly forcefulness, and such, may recommend a user is here to battle or fight instead of here to build an encyclopedia. On the off chance that a user has a debate, they are supposed to put the advantage of the task at a high need and look for a goal. A user whose outrage gets the best of them may find the battle has turned into their main focus, instead of contributing constructively to the wiki.
• Unscrupulous and gaming ways of behaving: Gaming the system, sockpuppetting, and different types of publication untrustworthiness. The wiki works on a premise of trust, and such exercises sabotage that trust and propose different thought processes or a total indifference for great altering conduct rehearses.
• Attempting to score "atta boys" or gain as numerous user freedoms or "grants" as could be expected (or excessively zeroing in on privileges overall): The user needs to acquire whatever number honors as could be expected under the circumstances or concentrates on acquiring user privileges through gaming the standards. While having grants isn't negative by and large, guaranteeing them and user access levels as a right and not an honor is harming and not the objective of these things. The user may likewise involve these honors as approvals to beyond the wiki as their accomplishments.
• Almost no interest in working cooperatively: Outrageous indifference for working usefully and agreeably with the local area where the perspectives on different users might contrast; outrageous indifference toward paying attention to others' authentic worries; interest in promoting as opposed to moderating clash like dismissing considerate way of behaving for teasing, obstructing for the purpose of deviating, redirecting debate goals from targets, heading out useful editors, or responsibility for.
• Major or hostile struggle of demeanor or expectation: Significant struggles of mentality, concerning wiki-related movement. A user might uphold outrageous or even crook perspectives or way of life in certain areas, or be disgusting to different users, but then be here to "build an encyclopedia". Notwithstanding, a few exercises are naturally conflicting with altering access, like lawful dangers against different users, provocation, or activities off-site that propose a horribly dissimilar expectation or ridiculous subverting of the task all in all. Editors should have the option to unwind together. Keeping up with mutual respect is fundamental in each trade. There is a degree of difference of crucial perspectives, whether in altering or to the undertaking overall, at which this may not be sensible to anticipate.

What "not here to build an encyclopedia" is not

• Zeroing in on specialty subjects: A user might have an interest in a dark subject that different users see as unimportant, or may post contents that are hard to fathom.
• Zeroing in on specific cycles: A user might have an interest in making hits, labeling articles for cleanup, further developing article consistence with the Manual of Style, or choosing articles for erasure. These are fundamental exercises that work on the wiki in circuitous ways. Many "in the background" cycles and exercises are fundamental to permit a huge number of users to all in all alter. Few out of every odd proofreader needs to perform "in front of an audience", by making articles and drafting new rules.

Being "here to build an encyclopedia" is about a user's general reason and conduct in altering the wiki. In taking into account whether a user is here to contribute, the user's general example of editing and contributing way of behaving, as well as the clearness of past warnings and their direction in improving, should be evaluated as well.